š šāA Negative SEO Exploit in Search Console -- The SEM Daily: 5.17.23
or "how to protect yourself against featured snippet removal"
This is SEM: your daily SEO inspiration, where I curate/summarize one valuable item related to SEO and send it your way M-F.
~
Todayās newsletter is brought to you by Searcheye and is about a negative SEO use of Googleās āoutdated contentā tool.
the Remove Outdated Content Tool (https://search.google.com/search-console/remove-outdated-content) can be used for removing other websiteās featured snippets.
It also, mysteriously, seems like it might be impacting ranking, which it shouldnāt.
There is some evidence for this, where shows a post his site has the featured snippet for, does a ā-domainā search to show what the next URL in line to get the featured snippet is if his wasnāt around, and then puts in an āoutdated contentā report of his own domain to see what would happen.
The result?
His article still has the first organic spot, but it has lost the featured snippet.
He did the same thing with a Screaming Frog Twitter carousel (with their consentābasically).
From this:
To this:
No more carousel, and the screaming frog twitter page went from spot #2 (carousel) to page 3.
Hereās a look at the outdated content removal request being granted:
This might be one of those things that seems āfineā from Googleās perspective. The sites do eventually recover? As long as someone doesnāt repeatedly submit the same URLs, itāll be fine.
If you have featured snippets, they are likely vulnerable to this technique, albeit temporarily.
If you are attempting to rank for a seasonal event, you are likely very vulnerable to this technique, albeit for the entire duration of the season.
If you are ranking on someone elseās platform, you are even more vulnerable to this.
My hope is that Google will properly investigate potential misuses of this tooling. If not, there are plenty more misuses to be surfaced.
It is possible to use your own Search Console to cancel these requests, so⦠maybe this is something you should occasionally checkāor check if you see your rankings fluctuation (ESPECIALLY around a featured snippet).
Hereās the full post if you want to take a look.
Coming up: my take on this whole thing. But first, a word from our sponsor:
Building Backlinks Just Got Easier
With just a few clicks, Searcheye turbocharges your online presence by securing high-impact links and PR brand mentions on the internet's most elite sites. Wave goodbye to shady practices and embrace the future of backlink building.
Experience the š Searcheye Revolution:
šÆĀ Daily personalized link-building opportunities delivered to your inbox
šĀ Exclusive access to premier sites like Blackberry.com, ATT.com, Fast Company, and more
šĀ Flexibility to choose between links or brand mentions
š¼Ā No contracts, no commitments ā just results
šĀ Kickstart your success with a FREE trial
My Take
The author says he is making this public in the hopes of putting pressure on Google to fix this exploit.
Iām just making this even more public because while, yes, you can use this abuse your competitors (you should not), you should also be aware that this is a thing that could possibly happen to your own site, so keep an eye out.
Iām just looking out for you, dawg!
Itās incredible just how much this can alter the SERPs (removing a Twitter carousel, kicking a page out of a featured snippet, etc). I wonder if this is something Google will look into.
Not a huge take on this one, just: wow. And make sure you check for this yourself if youāve lost a bit of traffic recently. Itās probably NOT this but⦠doesnāt hurt to check.
~
Links, Resources, and Recommendations
š To subscribe to my weekly(ish) longform SEO newsletter (new issue goes out this week!): sign up here.
š° If youāre interested in sponsoring this newsletter and reaching a bunch of smart SEOs: message me sem@hey.com.
š Looking for a solid agency to help grow your site? I recommend Smash Digital: tell them I sent you.
š¼ Follow me on LinkedIN: @sem
Until tomorrowā¦
Sean Markey
sem@hey.com
PS ā LMK what you thought of this quick SEO email. Good? Bad? āA bit shiteā as a reader reached out and shared? Iād love to hear from you (and thank you to those of you who read and have responded already!)
PPS ā I swear I take the ādailyā part of this email seriously, but we had a BIG situation here the last two days with a sick cat. It was fucking wild. The grossest thing, Iām not going to put what it was in this newsletter, but if youāre an internet weirdo and you want to know what this awful, crazy (gross) thing was, hit reply and ask me. I wrote it up, Iāll share it with you. But I did warn youā¦
(cat is mostly fine now. recovering)
hey:
Did you make it to the end of this newsletter and youāre still not a subscriber? Letās fix that right meow: